Interested in this Research Scientist role at Sprinter Health?
Apply Now →Skills & Technologies
About This Role
About Sprinter Health
-------------------------
At Sprinter Health, our mission is reimagining how people access care by bringing it directly to their homes. Nearly 30% of patients in the U.S. skip preventive or chronic care simply because they can’t get to a doctor’s office. For many, the ER becomes their first touchpoint with the healthcare system, driving over $300B in avoidable costs every year.
By using the same technologies that power leading marketplace and last\-mile platforms, we deliver care where people are, especially those who need it most. So far, we’ve supported more than 2 million patients across 22 states, completed 130,000\+ in\-home visits, and maintained a 92 NPS. Our team of clinicians, technologists, and operators has raised over $125M from investors like a16z, General Catalyst, GV, and Accel and enjoys multi\-year runway.
About the Role
------------------
We’re looking for an Applied Scientist, AI to turn messy, high\-stakes healthcare problems into machine learning models and AI systems that improve access to care and help Sprinter operate more effectively.
This role sits at the intersection of research, product, engineering, and clinical operations. You’ll take ambiguous product and operational problems and turn them into well\-scoped prediction, ranking, optimization, NLP, or LLM\-based tasks. You’ll build strong baselines, design honest evaluations, run careful error analysis, and iterate toward models that can improve real\-world outcomes.
The right person for this role combines scientific rigor with a deployment\-oriented mindset. You should care deeply about evaluation, leakage, bias, confounding, and whether offline results actually translate into production impact. You should also be able to partner closely with ML engineering to productionize models, work with clinicians and subject\-matter experts to validate assumptions, and explain model behavior, uncertainty, and limitations clearly to product and leadership.
This role is ideal for a scientist\-engineer who can move fluidly between data exploration, modeling, experimentation, error analysis, stakeholder partnership, and production handoff.
Office Location
-------------------
We are a hybrid company based in the Bay Area with offices in both San Francisco and Menlo Park. We operate on a hybrid schedule, working from the office Monday through Thursday, with Fridays designated as work\-from\-anywhere days.
We care deeply about work\-life balance and are happy to provide flexibility when life happens. We ask that employees be in the office Monday through Thursday to collaborate with their teams while maintaining flexibility where it matters most.
Lunch is provided every day, and the entire team takes an hour to eat together. It’s one of the ways we stay connected outside of meetings. You’ll usually find us playing a board game before getting back to work.
What you will do
--------------------
- Turn ambiguous healthcare, product, and operational problems into well\-posed ML, AI, ranking, optimization, NLP, or LLM\-based tasks
- Build strong baselines and improve on them efficiently using the right modeling approach for the problem
- Develop models across traditional ML, deep learning, NLP, and LLM\-based approaches where appropriate
- Design offline and online evaluations that are honest, measurable, and predictive of real\-world impact
- Choose metrics suited to imbalanced, delayed, noisy, and partially observed healthcare outcomes
- Run careful error analysis and use it to improve model quality, product fit, and operational usefulness
- Identify label leakage, selection bias, confounding, and other data artifacts before they reach production
- Explore messy real\-world data, assess label quality, and determine whether a problem is ready for modeling
- Partner with ML engineering to productionize models reliably and define what production\-readiness requires
- Work with clinical stakeholders and subject\-matter experts to validate assumptions, review model errors, and understand edge cases
- Explain model tradeoffs, uncertainty, limitations, and expected impact clearly to product, operations, clinical, and leadership teams
- Write experiment docs, summarize findings, and help teams make informed decisions about when and how to deploy AI systems
- Pressure\-test whether results are real, robust, and useful before recommending production use
What you have done
----------------------
- Built, evaluated, and iterated on machine learning or AI models for real\-world use cases
- Turned ambiguous business, product, clinical, or operational problems into measurable modeling tasks
- Designed rigorous offline evaluations, experiments, or analyses that informed production or product decisions
- Worked with messy real\-world datasets where labels, outcomes, and causal relationships are imperfect
- Used statistical reasoning, experimental design, and error analysis to understand model performance
- Built models using Python and standard ML or AI tooling such as PyTorch, scikit\-learn, NumPy, pandas, Polars, Hugging Face, Matplotlib, or similar
- Compared modeling approaches and made pragmatic decisions about when to use traditional ML, LLMs, heuristics, or simpler baselines
- Communicated model performance, limitations, tradeoffs, and uncertainty to technical and non\-technical stakeholders
- Partnered with engineering, product, data, operations, clinical, or domain experts to move models closer to production impact
- Operated with enough engineering depth to run experiments end to end and self\-serve deployments or production handoffs when needed
- Used AI coding assistants such as Claude Code, Cursor, or similar tools as part of your development workflow
What gives you an edge
--------------------------
- You have an MS or PhD in computer science, statistics, machine learning, applied math, operations research, biomedical informatics, epidemiology, or a related quantitative field
- You have exceptional applied experience that substitutes for formal graduate training
- You have depth in LLMs, ranking, NLP, uncertainty quantification, causal inference, optimization, or healthcare AI
- You’ve shipped models that reached production and had measurable real\-world impact
- You’ve worked with healthcare data such as claims, EHR, clinical notes, scheduling, utilization, quality, risk, or patient engagement data
- You have experience working with PHI, HIPAA\-aware systems, or other sensitive regulated data
- You know when traditional ML approaches are likely to outperform LLMs, and when LLMs are the right tool
- You have experience collaborating with clinicians, clinical operations teams, or other high\-stakes domain experts
- You’ve worked in a startup or fast\-moving applied environment where ambiguity, speed, and rigor all mattered
What makes you successful
-----------------------------
- You understand how ML models work under the hood and can explain them clearly to non\-technical stakeholders
- You focus relentlessly on impact and know that the simplest model is often the best one
- You treat evaluation as one of the most important parts of model development
- You notice when a metric is misleading, incomplete, or disconnected from real\-world outcomes
- You catch leakage, bias, and confounding that others miss
- You move fluidly between modeling, error analysis, stakeholder partnership, and production handoff
- You can hand a model to engineering and explain its limits to a clinician with equal clarity
- You are comfortable with ambiguity and can adapt modeling approaches to problems that do not come with a playbook
- You balance scientific rigor with the practical need to ship useful systems
Day to Day
--------------
In this role, you might spend your time:
- Exploring data and labels for a new healthcare or operational problem
- Turning an ambiguous product question into a measurable modeling task
- Building and comparing models, then running error analysis
- Reviewing misclassified or low\-confidence cases with a clinical subject\-matter expert
- Designing an offline evaluation that is more likely to predict online or real\-world success
- Partnering with ML engineering to prepare a model for deployment
- Writing an experiment doc and presenting findings to product and leadership
- Pressure\-testing whether a result is real or an artifact of the data
- Comparing a simple baseline, traditional ML model, and LLM\-based approach to determine what is most useful
- Investigating why model performance differs across populations, workflows, labels, or operational contexts
The Interview Process
-------------------------
We aim to complete the interview process within 2–3 weeks. It will usually consist of:
- Recruiter Screen: Background fit, motivation, and compensation alignment
- Hiring Manager Interview: Applied science experience, modeling depth, and healthcare/product orientation
- Hands\-on Technical Assessment: Practical modeling, evaluation, error analysis, and scientific judgment
- Onsite Interview: Technical case study, research or project presentation, behavioral interview, and lunch with the team
- References: Validation of performance, judgment, and working style
What we offer
-----------------
- Meaningful pre\-IPO equity
- Medical, dental, and vision plans 100% paid for you and your dependents
- Flexible PTO \+ 10 paid holidays per year
- 401(k) with match
- 16\-week parental leave policy for birthing parent, 8 weeks for all other parents
- HSA \+ FSA contributions
- Life insurance, plus short and long\-term disability coverage
- Free daily lunch in\-office
- Annual learning stipend
- Relocation assistance
Equal Opportunity Statement
-------------------------------
Sprinter Health is an equal opportunity employer. We value diversity at our company. We do not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, age, marital status, veteran status, disability status, or other protected classes.
Beware of recruitment fraud and scams that involve fictitious job descriptions followed by false job offers.
If you are applying for a job, you can confirm the legitimacy of a job posting by viewing current open roles on our official Sprinter Health Careers website. All legitimate job postings will require an application to be made directly on our official Sprinter Health Careers website. Job\-related communications will only be sent from email addresses ending in @sprinterhealth.com. Please ensure that you’re only replying to emails that end with @sprinterhealth.com.
Compensation Range: $180K \- $260K
Salary Context
This $180K-$260K range is above the 75th percentile for Research Scientist roles in our dataset (median: $183K across 83 roles with salary data).
Role Details
About This Role
Research Scientists push the boundaries of what AI can do. They design experiments, develop novel architectures, publish papers, and translate research breakthroughs into production capabilities. This is where the fundamental advances happen, from attention mechanisms to diffusion models to reasoning chains.
The work is intellectually demanding and often ambiguous. You might spend months on an approach that doesn't pan out. The best research scientists combine deep mathematical intuition with engineering pragmatism. They know when to go deep on theory and when to run experiments. They read papers voraciously and can spot incremental contributions from genuine breakthroughs.
Across the 3,708 AI roles we're tracking, Research Scientist positions make up 3% of the market. At Sprinter Health, this role fits into their broader AI and engineering organization.
Research Scientist roles are concentrated at major AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta FAIR) and well-funded AI startups. The competition is intense. PhD is effectively required for most positions, and publication track record matters. Compensation is among the highest in AI, reflecting both the scarcity of talent and the strategic importance of research breakthroughs.
What the Work Looks Like
A typical week includes: reading and discussing recent papers with your team, designing and running experiments on multi-GPU clusters, analyzing results and iterating on hypotheses, writing up findings for internal review or publication, and collaborating with engineering teams to productionize promising results. The ratio of thinking to coding is higher than in engineering roles.
Research Scientist roles are concentrated at major AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta FAIR) and well-funded AI startups. The competition is intense. PhD is effectively required for most positions, and publication track record matters. Compensation is among the highest in AI, reflecting both the scarcity of talent and the strategic importance of research breakthroughs.
Skills Required
PhD strongly preferred for most roles. Deep expertise in a specific area (NLP, computer vision, reinforcement learning, multimodal) is expected. PyTorch is the standard. Publication track record matters. Strong mathematical foundations in linear algebra, probability, optimization, and information theory are assumed.
Beyond the fundamentals, companies value experience with large-scale distributed training, novel architecture design, and the ability to bridge theory and practice. Understanding of current frontier topics (reasoning, multimodal, long-context, alignment) is essential. Code quality matters more than many researchers expect. Labs want researchers who can implement their ideas cleanly.
Strong research postings specify the research area, mention the team you'd join, and describe the problems they're working on. They often list recent publications from the team. Vague 'AI research' postings without specifics usually mean the company wants to sound impressive but doesn't have a real research agenda.
Compensation Benchmarks
Research Scientist roles pay a median of $222,200 based on 197 positions with disclosed compensation. Mid-level AI roles across all categories have a median of $200,000. Disclosed range: $180K to $260K.
Across all AI roles, the market median is $217,500. Top-quartile compensation starts at $272,100. The 90th percentile reaches $325,000. For comparison, the highest-paying categories include AI Safety ($300,000) and Research Engineer ($280,000). By seniority level: Entry: $120,000; Mid: $200,000; Senior: $230,000; Director: $272,150; VP: $250,000.
Sprinter Health AI Hiring
Sprinter Health has 5 open AI roles right now. They're hiring across AI/ML Engineer, Research Scientist. Positions span Menlo Park, CA, US, San Francisco, CA, US. Compensation range: $220K - $270K.
Location Context
AI roles in San Francisco pay a median of $277,088 across 810 tracked positions. That's 27% above the national median.
Career Path
Common paths into Research Scientist roles include PhD Student, Research Engineer, Postdoc.
From here, career progression typically leads toward Research Lead, Distinguished Scientist, VP of Research.
The PhD is the entry point for most paths. Choose your advisor and research area carefully since they'll define your first industry position. Publish consistently, contribute to open-source projects in your area, and build relationships at conferences. Industry research offers better compensation and compute resources than academia, but the pressure to show product impact is real.
What to Expect in Interviews
Research interviews are multi-stage: a research talk (present your best paper), technical deep-dives on your methodology, and often a 'research proposal' exercise where you design an experiment to test a hypothesis. Coding rounds test implementation ability alongside theoretical knowledge. Be prepared to implement a paper from scratch and discuss the design choices the authors made. Strong candidates can critique papers constructively and identify gaps in experimental methodology.
When evaluating opportunities: Strong research postings specify the research area, mention the team you'd join, and describe the problems they're working on. They often list recent publications from the team. Vague 'AI research' postings without specifics usually mean the company wants to sound impressive but doesn't have a real research agenda.
AI Hiring Overview
The AI job market has 3,708 open positions tracked in our dataset. By seniority: 102 entry-level, 1,705 mid-level, 1,469 senior, and 432 leadership roles (Director, VP, C-Level). Remote roles make up 14% of the market (508 positions). The remaining 3,180 roles require on-site or hybrid attendance.
The market median for AI roles is $217,500. Top-quartile compensation starts at $272,100. The 90th percentile reaches $325,000. Highest-paying categories: AI Safety ($300,000 median, 21 roles); Research Engineer ($280,000 median, 147 roles); AI Architect ($254,798 median, 67 roles).
Research Scientist roles are concentrated at major AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta FAIR) and well-funded AI startups. The competition is intense. PhD is effectively required for most positions, and publication track record matters. Compensation is among the highest in AI, reflecting both the scarcity of talent and the strategic importance of research breakthroughs.
The AI Job Market Today
The AI job market spans 3,708 open positions across 16 role categories. The largest categories by volume: AI/ML Engineer (2,605), Data Scientist (310), AI Software Engineer (259). These three account for the majority of open positions, though smaller categories often have higher per-role compensation because of specialized skill requirements.
The seniority mix tells a story about where AI teams are in their maturity. Entry-level roles (102) are outnumbered by mid-level (1,705) and senior (1,469) positions, reflecting that most companies are past the 'build a team from scratch' phase and need experienced engineers who can ship production systems. Leadership roles (Director, VP, C-Level) total 432 positions, representing the bottleneck between technical execution and organizational strategy.
Remote work availability sits at 14% of all AI roles (508 positions), with 3,180 requiring on-site or hybrid attendance. The remote share has stabilized after the post-pandemic correction. Senior and specialized roles (Research Scientist, ML Architect) are more likely to be remote-eligible than entry-level positions, partly because experienced hires have more negotiating power and partly because these roles require less hands-on mentorship.
AI compensation is structured in clear tiers. The market median sits at $217,500. Top-quartile roles start at $272,100, and the 90th percentile reaches $325,000. These figures include base salary with disclosed compensation. Total compensation (including equity, bonuses, and sign-on) runs 20-40% higher at companies that offer those components.
Category matters for compensation. AI Safety roles lead at $300,000 median, while Prompt Engineer roles sit at $140,000. The spread between highest and lowest-paying categories reflects the premium on specialized technical skills versus broader analytical roles.
The most in-demand skills across all AI postings: Python (1,890 postings), Aws (1,103 postings), Azure (877 postings), Rag (855 postings), Gcp (631 postings), Prompt Engineering (560 postings), Pytorch (545 postings), Claude (498 postings). Python dominates, appearing in the vast majority of role descriptions regardless of category. Cloud platform experience (AWS, GCP, Azure) is the second most common requirement. The newer entrants to the top skills list (RAG, vector databases, LLM APIs) reflect the shift from traditional ML toward generative AI applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
Get Weekly AI Career Intelligence
Salary data, skills demand, and market signals from 16,000+ AI job postings. Every Monday.