Interested in this Research Scientist role at Plato?
Apply Now →Skills & Technologies
About This Role
About Plato
Plato is an applied research lab building the foundational infrastructure to train specialized AI agents.
We turn real-world data streams into high-fidelity simulated environments that generate the training signal needed to make capable models. Our work supports frontier labs, hyperscalers, and enterprises building AI systems for complex, high-stakes work.
Today, only a handful of players can train models for capable work. Compute and algorithms are rapidly commoditizing, but reinforcement learning data remains the bottleneck. Plato is changing that by automatically scaling training environments from proprietary real-world data.
Why Apply
- Work with the frontier: Build safety environments and benchmarks that research teams at leading AI labs can use to measure emerging capabilities and misaligned behavior.
- Real ownership: Help set Plato’s safety evaluation agenda, from the research questions worth testing to the evidence we share with lab partners.
- Research to production: Work with engineers to turn experimental designs into runnable environments, with a short path from an idea to an evaluation labs can use.
The Role
Plato is hiring an individual contributor researcher to design safety environments and benchmarks, starting with evaluations that measure how well AI models can improve themselves and other models.
You will establish a new research direction at Plato, designing safety-relevant benchmarks and working with engineers to turn them into runnable environments. Your initial focus will be measuring AI R&D capabilities, including experiment design, model training, and research replication.
You will also investigate reward hacking, sabotage, deception, and other misaligned behavior. The work spans research design, empirical evaluation, and failure analysis, with substantial ownership of the research agenda. Some environments may also be used in training to reduce the behaviors they reveal.
What You’ll Do
- Design Safety Benchmarks: Measure AI research automation and self-improvement. Define tasks, baselines, budgets, and success criteria that separate meaningful progress from superficial completion.
- Build Safety Environments: Design environments that expose reward hacking, sabotage, deception, and failures to follow intended constraints.
- Hold the Evaluation Bar: Investigate contamination, grader weaknesses, task ambiguity, and shortcuts that could make a result misleading.
- Track Frontier Capabilities: Run experiments with current models, inspect trajectories and failures, and measure how capabilities change across models and over time.
- Work with Engineering: Turn research designs into reproducible environments with clear scoring, useful instrumentation, and documented limitations.
- Share the Findings: Translate results into benchmark releases, research reports, and concrete recommendations for lab partners.
Required Qualifications
- Recent Research: Hands-on work in frontier-model evaluation, benchmarks, or AI safety in the past one to two years.
- Research Track Record: Meaningful contributions to papers, released benchmarks, public reports, or comparable empirical work. We care about the quality of your work and your contribution more than credentials or years of experience.
- Current Model Knowledge: Practical familiarity with current frontier models and a specific, evidence-based view of their capabilities, limitations, and likely development.
- Experimental Judgment: You can explain what an evaluation measures, how it could be gamed, and which conclusions its results do and do not support.
- Research Ownership: Ability to turn an ambiguous question into a concrete experimental design and collaborate closely with engineers to implement it.
- Safety Focus: Interest in measuring safety-relevant capabilities and behavior, including the tradeoffs when evaluation environments are also used for training.
- Bay Area Based: Based in the San Francisco Bay Area, or willing to relocate.
Preferred Qualifications
- Designed and released a benchmark, particularly for AI R&D, long-horizon agents, dangerous capabilities, or AI control. Relevant reference points include RE-Bench, MLE-bench, and PaperBench.
- Experience in an independent evaluation or safety organization, a frontier lab safety team, or pre-deployment testing with labs or government evaluation bodies.
- Direct research on models conducting ML experiments, training or improving other models, replicating papers, or completing extended research tasks.
- A software engineering background or programming skills that let you implement environments, evaluation harnesses, and analysis tools yourself.
- Experience publishing rigorous empirical research, including work at major machine-learning venues.
Compensation Range: $275K - $450K
Salary Context
This $275K-$450K range is above the 75th percentile for Research Scientist roles in our dataset (median: $196K across 89 roles with salary data).
Role Details
About This Role
Research Scientists push the boundaries of what AI can do. They design experiments, develop novel architectures, publish papers, and translate research breakthroughs into production capabilities. This is where the fundamental advances happen, from attention mechanisms to diffusion models to reasoning chains.
The work is intellectually demanding and often ambiguous. You might spend months on an approach that doesn't pan out. The best research scientists combine deep mathematical intuition with engineering pragmatism. They know when to go deep on theory and when to run experiments. They read papers voraciously and can spot incremental contributions from genuine breakthroughs.
Across the 10,827 AI roles we're tracking, Research Scientist positions make up 2% of the market. At Plato, this role fits into their broader AI and engineering organization.
Research Scientist roles are concentrated at major AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta FAIR) and well-funded AI startups. The competition is intense. PhD is effectively required for most positions, and publication track record matters. Compensation is among the highest in AI, reflecting both the scarcity of talent and the strategic importance of research breakthroughs.
What the Work Looks Like
A typical week includes: reading and discussing recent papers with your team, designing and running experiments on multi-GPU clusters, analyzing results and iterating on hypotheses, writing up findings for internal review or publication, and collaborating with engineering teams to productionize promising results. The ratio of thinking to coding is higher than in engineering roles.
Research Scientist roles are concentrated at major AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta FAIR) and well-funded AI startups. The competition is intense. PhD is effectively required for most positions, and publication track record matters. Compensation is among the highest in AI, reflecting both the scarcity of talent and the strategic importance of research breakthroughs.
Skills Required
PhD strongly preferred for most roles. Deep expertise in a specific area (NLP, computer vision, reinforcement learning, multimodal) is expected. PyTorch is the standard. Publication track record matters. Strong mathematical foundations in linear algebra, probability, optimization, and information theory are assumed.
Beyond the fundamentals, companies value experience with large-scale distributed training, novel architecture design, and the ability to bridge theory and practice. Understanding of current frontier topics (reasoning, multimodal, long-context, alignment) is essential. Code quality matters more than many researchers expect. Labs want researchers who can implement their ideas cleanly.
Strong research postings specify the research area, mention the team you'd join, and describe the problems they're working on. They often list recent publications from the team. Vague 'AI research' postings without specifics usually mean the company wants to sound impressive but doesn't have a real research agenda.
Compensation Benchmarks
Research Scientist roles pay a median of $223,400 based on 789 positions with disclosed compensation. Senior-level AI roles across all categories have a median of $230,000. This role's midpoint ($362K) sits 62% above the category median. Disclosed range: $275K to $450K.
Across all AI roles, the market median is $213,480. Top-quartile compensation starts at $264,111. The 90th percentile reaches $318,400. For comparison, the highest-paying categories include AI Safety ($266,050) and AI Engineering Manager ($253,461). By seniority level: Entry: $112,320; Mid: $193,200; Senior: $230,000; Director: $272,300; VP: $236,450.
Plato AI Hiring
Plato has 1 open AI role right now. They're hiring across Research Scientist. Based in San Francisco, CA, US. Compensation range: $450K - $450K.
Location Context
AI roles in San Francisco pay a median of $260,600 across 2,767 tracked positions. That's 22% above the national median.
Career Path
Common paths into Research Scientist roles include PhD Student, Research Engineer, Postdoc.
From here, career progression typically leads toward Research Lead, Distinguished Scientist, VP of Research.
The PhD is the entry point for most paths. Choose your advisor and research area carefully since they'll define your first industry position. Publish consistently, contribute to open-source projects in your area, and build relationships at conferences. Industry research offers better compensation and compute resources than academia, but the pressure to show product impact is real.
What to Expect in Interviews
Research interviews are multi-stage: a research talk (present your best paper), technical deep-dives on your methodology, and often a 'research proposal' exercise where you design an experiment to test a hypothesis. Coding rounds test implementation ability alongside theoretical knowledge. Be prepared to implement a paper from scratch and discuss the design choices the authors made. Strong candidates can critique papers constructively and identify gaps in experimental methodology.
When evaluating opportunities: Strong research postings specify the research area, mention the team you'd join, and describe the problems they're working on. They often list recent publications from the team. Vague 'AI research' postings without specifics usually mean the company wants to sound impressive but doesn't have a real research agenda.
AI Hiring Overview
The AI job market has 10,827 open positions tracked in our dataset. By seniority: 122 entry-level, 5,256 mid-level, 3,922 senior, and 1,527 leadership roles (Director, VP, C-Level). Remote roles make up 6% of the market (665 positions). The remaining 10,097 roles require on-site or hybrid attendance.
The market median for AI roles is $213,480. Top-quartile compensation starts at $264,111. The 90th percentile reaches $318,400. Highest-paying categories: AI Safety ($266,050 median, 70 roles); AI Engineering Manager ($253,461 median, 58 roles); Research Engineer ($252,000 median, 476 roles).
Research Scientist roles are concentrated at major AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta FAIR) and well-funded AI startups. The competition is intense. PhD is effectively required for most positions, and publication track record matters. Compensation is among the highest in AI, reflecting both the scarcity of talent and the strategic importance of research breakthroughs.
The AI Job Market Today
The AI job market spans 10,827 open positions across 16 role categories. The largest categories by volume: AI/ML Engineer (8,288), AI Software Engineer (548), AI Product Manager (471). These three account for the majority of open positions, though smaller categories often have higher per-role compensation because of specialized skill requirements.
The seniority mix tells a story about where AI teams are in their maturity. Entry-level roles (122) are outnumbered by mid-level (5,256) and senior (3,922) positions, reflecting that most companies are past the 'build a team from scratch' phase and need experienced engineers who can ship production systems. Leadership roles (Director, VP, C-Level) total 1,527 positions, representing the bottleneck between technical execution and organizational strategy.
Remote work availability sits at 6% of all AI roles (665 positions), with 10,097 requiring on-site or hybrid attendance. The remote share has stabilized after the post-pandemic correction. Senior and specialized roles (Research Scientist, ML Architect) are more likely to be remote-eligible than entry-level positions, partly because experienced hires have more negotiating power and partly because these roles require less hands-on mentorship.
AI compensation is structured in clear tiers. The market median sits at $213,480. Top-quartile roles start at $264,111, and the 90th percentile reaches $318,400. These figures include base salary with disclosed compensation. Total compensation (including equity, bonuses, and sign-on) runs 20-40% higher at companies that offer those components.
Category matters for compensation. AI Safety roles lead at $266,050 median, while Prompt Engineer roles sit at $140,000. The spread between highest and lowest-paying categories reflects the premium on specialized technical skills versus broader analytical roles.
The most in-demand skills across all AI postings: Python (2,093 postings), Aws (1,100 postings), Azure (910 postings), Rag (863 postings), Gcp (680 postings), Pytorch (549 postings), Claude (532 postings), Kubernetes (511 postings). Python dominates, appearing in the vast majority of role descriptions regardless of category. Cloud platform experience (AWS, GCP, Azure) is the second most common requirement. The newer entrants to the top skills list (RAG, vector databases, LLM APIs) reflect the shift from traditional ML toward generative AI applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
Get Weekly AI Career Intelligence
Salary data, skills demand, and market signals from 16,000+ AI job postings. Every Monday.