Interested in this Research Scientist role at Anthropic?
Apply Now →Skills & Technologies
About This Role
About Anthropic
-------------------
Anthropic’s mission is to create reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems. We want AI to be safe and beneficial for our users and for society as a whole. Our team is a quickly growing group of committed researchers, engineers, policy experts, and business leaders working together to build beneficial AI systems.
About the role
------------------
We are seeking a Recruiting Research Scientist to join our People Data Solutions team. You’ll be the research expert supporting our Recruiting organization, using rigorous scientific methods to advance our understanding of recruiting funnels, interview effectiveness, candidate experience, and recruiting capacity. This role sits at the intersection of organizational science, behavioral research, and people strategy – developing novel frameworks and conducting systematic research that drives evidence\-based people decisions across our growing organization.
This role offers the opportunity to make a significant impact on both our recruiting practices and the broader field of people science at a leading AI safety company.
Responsibilities
--------------------
Research design \& scientific inquiry
- Design and execute systematic research studies to answer fundamental questions about recruiting funnel health, assessment quality, candidate experience, and quality of hire
- Generate and test hypotheses about sourcing strategies, interview design, and selection decisions using rigorous experimental and quasi\-experimental methods
- Conduct mixed\-method research to understand what are the drivers and blockers to recruiting operations.
- Navigate research ethics considerations when studying candidate data, ensuring responsible research practices
Selection \& assessment research
- Design and execute validation studies to assess the quality of interviews and other selection tools
- Utilize psychometric techniques to analyze and improve interviewer calibration and rating consistency
- Lead investigative research into innovative approaches for candidate assessment
Metrics design and governance
- Design the metrics framework for recruiting org health — defining the canonical KPIs, dimensions, and definitions that leadership uses to understand funnel performance, capacity, and hiring quality
- Establish the governance and definitional rigor that keeps metrics consistent across tools and reporting surfaces
Analytical solution building
- Architect analytical solutions that convert research insights into actionable products, empowering stakeholders to execute data\-driven scenario and strategic planning
- Quantify the adoption and downstream impact of deployed tools, driving iterative improvements
Visualization \& communication
- Build compelling visualizations and dashboards that make complex research findings accessible to diverse audiences
- Present research findings to senior leadership with clear, actionable recommendations
Minimum Qualifications:
---------------------------
- Hold an advanced degree (Master’s or PhD) in I/O Psychology, Organizational Behavior, Statistics, Data Science, Economics, Behavioral Science, or a related research field
- Have experience with selection research, assessment validation, psychometrics, or recruiting funnel analytics
- Are comfortable working in the People Analytics tech stack and collaborating with data engineers
- Are proficient in SQL and Python/R, with experience in statistical analysis and machine learning
- Have experience with data visualization and can tell compelling stories with research findings
- Possess excellent communication skills and can influence stakeholders at all levels
- Thrive in ambiguity and can balance rigor with pragmatism
- Have a track record of challenging assumptions with data and changing long\-held practices
- Can navigate sensitive topics diplomatically while maintaining analytical rigor
- Demonstrate intellectual humility and comfort with iterative discovery
- Use data to improve how organizations find, assess, and hire talent
Preferred Qualifications:
-----------------------------
- 5 \+ years of experience in research, people analytics, or related quantitative fields with demonstrated research methodology expertise
- Background in recruiting analytics specifically (not just general analytics)
- Experience running interview or assessment validation studies
- Experience building self\-service analytics tools or dashboards
- Previous experience in high\-growth technology companies or AI/ML organizations
- Familiarity with network analysis, machine learning, or advanced statistical methods
- Experience with BigQuery and modern data stack tools
- Experience with Greenhouse, Gem, ModernLoop, or similar recruiting tools
The annual compensation range for this role is listed below.
For sales roles, the range provided is the role’s On Target Earnings ("OTE") range, meaning that the range includes both the sales commissions/sales bonuses target and annual base salary for the role.
Annual Salary:
$275,000 \- $370,000 USDLogistics
-------------
Minimum education: Bachelor’s degree or an equivalent combination of education, training, and/or experience
Required field of study: A field relevant to the role as demonstrated through coursework, training, or professional experience
Minimum years of experience: Years of experience required will correlate with the internal job level requirements for the position
Location\-based hybrid policy: Currently, we expect all staff to be in one of our offices at least 25% of the time. However, some roles may require more time in our offices.
Visa sponsorship: We do sponsor visas! However, we aren't able to successfully sponsor visas for every role and every candidate. But if we make you an offer, we will make every reasonable effort to get you a visa, and we retain an immigration lawyer to help with this.
We encourage you to apply even if you do not believe you meet every single qualification. Not all strong candidates will meet every single qualification as listed. Research shows that people who identify as being from underrepresented groups are more prone to experiencing imposter syndrome and doubting the strength of their candidacy, so we urge you not to exclude yourself prematurely and to submit an application if you're interested in this work. We think AI systems like the ones we're building have enormous social and ethical implications. We think this makes representation even more important, and we strive to include a range of diverse perspectives on our team.
Your safety matters to us. To protect yourself from potential scams, remember that Anthropic recruiters only contact you from @anthropic.com email addresses. In some cases, we may partner with vetted recruiting agencies who will identify themselves as working on behalf of Anthropic. Be cautious of emails from other domains. Legitimate Anthropic recruiters will never ask for money, fees, or banking information before your first day. If you're ever unsure about a communication, don't click any links—visit anthropic.com/careers directly for confirmed position openings.
How we're different
-----------------------
We believe that the highest\-impact AI research will be big science. At Anthropic we work as a single cohesive team on just a few large\-scale research efforts. And we value impact — advancing our long\-term goals of steerable, trustworthy AI — rather than work on smaller and more specific puzzles. We view AI research as an empirical science, which has as much in common with physics and biology as with traditional efforts in computer science. We're an extremely collaborative group, and we host frequent research discussions to ensure that we are pursuing the highest\-impact work at any given time. As such, we greatly value communication skills.
The easiest way to understand our research directions is to read our recent research. This research continues many of the directions our team worked on prior to Anthropic, including: GPT\-3, Circuit\-Based Interpretability, Multimodal Neurons, Scaling Laws, AI \& Compute, Concrete Problems in AI Safety, and Learning from Human Preferences.
Come work with us!
----------------------
Anthropic is a public benefit corporation headquartered in San Francisco. We offer competitive compensation and benefits, optional equity donation matching, generous vacation and parental leave, flexible working hours, and a lovely office space in which to collaborate with colleagues. Guidance on Candidates' AI Usage: Learn about our policy for using AI in our application process.
Salary Context
This $275K-$370K range is above the 75th percentile for Research Scientist roles in our dataset (median: $182K across 52 roles with salary data).
Role Details
About This Role
Research Scientists push the boundaries of what AI can do. They design experiments, develop novel architectures, publish papers, and translate research breakthroughs into production capabilities. This is where the fundamental advances happen, from attention mechanisms to diffusion models to reasoning chains.
The work is intellectually demanding and often ambiguous. You might spend months on an approach that doesn't pan out. The best research scientists combine deep mathematical intuition with engineering pragmatism. They know when to go deep on theory and when to run experiments. They read papers voraciously and can spot incremental contributions from genuine breakthroughs.
Across the 1,809 AI roles we're tracking, Research Scientist positions make up 3% of the market. At Anthropic, this role fits into their broader AI and engineering organization.
Research Scientist roles are concentrated at major AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta FAIR) and well-funded AI startups. The competition is intense. PhD is effectively required for most positions, and publication track record matters. Compensation is among the highest in AI, reflecting both the scarcity of talent and the strategic importance of research breakthroughs.
What the Work Looks Like
A typical week includes: reading and discussing recent papers with your team, designing and running experiments on multi-GPU clusters, analyzing results and iterating on hypotheses, writing up findings for internal review or publication, and collaborating with engineering teams to productionize promising results. The ratio of thinking to coding is higher than in engineering roles.
Research Scientist roles are concentrated at major AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta FAIR) and well-funded AI startups. The competition is intense. PhD is effectively required for most positions, and publication track record matters. Compensation is among the highest in AI, reflecting both the scarcity of talent and the strategic importance of research breakthroughs.
Skills Required
PhD strongly preferred for most roles. Deep expertise in a specific area (NLP, computer vision, reinforcement learning, multimodal) is expected. PyTorch is the standard. Publication track record matters. Strong mathematical foundations in linear algebra, probability, optimization, and information theory are assumed.
Beyond the fundamentals, companies value experience with large-scale distributed training, novel architecture design, and the ability to bridge theory and practice. Understanding of current frontier topics (reasoning, multimodal, long-context, alignment) is essential. Code quality matters more than many researchers expect. Labs want researchers who can implement their ideas cleanly.
Strong research postings specify the research area, mention the team you'd join, and describe the problems they're working on. They often list recent publications from the team. Vague 'AI research' postings without specifics usually mean the company wants to sound impressive but doesn't have a real research agenda.
Compensation Benchmarks
Research Scientist roles pay a median of $223,400 based on 307 positions with disclosed compensation. Mid-level AI roles across all categories have a median of $165,778. This role's midpoint ($322K) sits 44% above the category median. Disclosed range: $275K to $370K.
Across all AI roles, the market median is $200,700. Top-quartile compensation starts at $254,000. The 90th percentile reaches $307,500. For comparison, the highest-paying categories include AI Safety ($274,200) and AI Engineering Manager ($268,700). By seniority level: Entry: $97,760; Mid: $165,778; Senior: $227,400; Director: $250,000; VP: $250,000.
Anthropic AI Hiring
Anthropic has 2 open AI roles right now. They're hiring across Research Scientist. Based in New York, NY, US. Compensation range: $370K - $370K.
Location Context
AI roles in New York pay a median of $211,000 across 2,760 tracked positions. That's 5% above the national median.
Career Path
Common paths into Research Scientist roles include PhD Student, Research Engineer, Postdoc.
From here, career progression typically leads toward Research Lead, Distinguished Scientist, VP of Research.
The PhD is the entry point for most paths. Choose your advisor and research area carefully since they'll define your first industry position. Publish consistently, contribute to open-source projects in your area, and build relationships at conferences. Industry research offers better compensation and compute resources than academia, but the pressure to show product impact is real.
What to Expect in Interviews
Research interviews are multi-stage: a research talk (present your best paper), technical deep-dives on your methodology, and often a 'research proposal' exercise where you design an experiment to test a hypothesis. Coding rounds test implementation ability alongside theoretical knowledge. Be prepared to implement a paper from scratch and discuss the design choices the authors made. Strong candidates can critique papers constructively and identify gaps in experimental methodology.
When evaluating opportunities: Strong research postings specify the research area, mention the team you'd join, and describe the problems they're working on. They often list recent publications from the team. Vague 'AI research' postings without specifics usually mean the company wants to sound impressive but doesn't have a real research agenda.
AI Hiring Overview
The AI job market has 1,809 open positions tracked in our dataset. By seniority: 34 entry-level, 797 mid-level, 728 senior, and 250 leadership roles (Director, VP, C-Level). Remote roles make up 16% of the market (294 positions). The remaining 1,505 roles require on-site or hybrid attendance.
The market median for AI roles is $200,700. Top-quartile compensation starts at $254,000. The 90th percentile reaches $307,500. Highest-paying categories: AI Safety ($274,200 median, 57 roles); AI Engineering Manager ($268,700 median, 42 roles); Research Engineer ($260,000 median, 442 roles).
Research Scientist roles are concentrated at major AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta FAIR) and well-funded AI startups. The competition is intense. PhD is effectively required for most positions, and publication track record matters. Compensation is among the highest in AI, reflecting both the scarcity of talent and the strategic importance of research breakthroughs.
The AI Job Market Today
The AI job market spans 1,809 open positions across 15 role categories. The largest categories by volume: AI/ML Engineer (1,274), Data Scientist (145), AI Software Engineer (132). These three account for the majority of open positions, though smaller categories often have higher per-role compensation because of specialized skill requirements.
The seniority mix tells a story about where AI teams are in their maturity. Entry-level roles (34) are outnumbered by mid-level (797) and senior (728) positions, reflecting that most companies are past the 'build a team from scratch' phase and need experienced engineers who can ship production systems. Leadership roles (Director, VP, C-Level) total 250 positions, representing the bottleneck between technical execution and organizational strategy.
Remote work availability sits at 16% of all AI roles (294 positions), with 1,505 requiring on-site or hybrid attendance. The remote share has stabilized after the post-pandemic correction. Senior and specialized roles (Research Scientist, ML Architect) are more likely to be remote-eligible than entry-level positions, partly because experienced hires have more negotiating power and partly because these roles require less hands-on mentorship.
AI compensation is structured in clear tiers. The market median sits at $200,700. Top-quartile roles start at $254,000, and the 90th percentile reaches $307,500. These figures include base salary with disclosed compensation. Total compensation (including equity, bonuses, and sign-on) runs 20-40% higher at companies that offer those components.
Category matters for compensation. AI Safety roles lead at $274,200 median, while Prompt Engineer roles sit at $140,000. The spread between highest and lowest-paying categories reflects the premium on specialized technical skills versus broader analytical roles.
The most in-demand skills across all AI postings: Python (877 postings), Aws (592 postings), Azure (458 postings), Rag (380 postings), Gcp (364 postings), Pytorch (277 postings), Prompt Engineering (266 postings), Claude (250 postings). Python dominates, appearing in the vast majority of role descriptions regardless of category. Cloud platform experience (AWS, GCP, Azure) is the second most common requirement. The newer entrants to the top skills list (RAG, vector databases, LLM APIs) reflect the shift from traditional ML toward generative AI applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
Get Weekly AI Career Intelligence
Salary data, skills demand, and market signals from 16,000+ AI job postings. Every Monday.